Er det ok.?

    Vil bare høre om jeres mening om min nye færdigt bygge Gamming PC :)) :cheers: ... Er det godt eller er der nogle ting som jeg skal skifte ud til noget andet? take any advice :thumbsup:


    • Monitor: 27¨LED FullHD 3D 120Hz Samsung SA950 Series 9.
      Strømforsyning: Corsair AX860 PSU. + (Corsair Professional Sleeved Cable Red).
      CPU: AMD FX-8350 Black Editor 8-Core 4Ghz 16Mb AM3+.
      Bundkort: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 AM3+.
      Grafikkort: Asus R9 290X 4Gb.
      Køling: Corsair H105 HYDRO CPU Cooler.
      HD: Samsung SSD 840 EVO 500GB, Intel SSD 335 Series SATA-600 240Gb, WD SATA-600 2Tb.
      Ram: 16Gb. Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1866Mhz CL9.
      Kabinet: Corsair Obsidian 750D.
      System: Windows 8.1 64Bit.
      Tastatur: Corsair Vengeance K95.
      Mus: Steelseries SENSEI Pro Gamming Laser Mouse.
      Headset: Logitech G930.

    Det ser rigtig fornuftigt ud, men bruger du ikke nogle tunge multitråde programmer, så kan du sagtens gå ned til 8 GB i ram.


    Mvh
    Sam

    AMD 2600X Ryzen, MSI X470 gaming plus, 16GB G.Skill 24ooMhz DDR4 ram, Noctua NH-U12S, Sapphire RX Vega 56 Pulse ,Crucial MX100 512GB SSD(OS), Crucial MX500 2TB SSD,2 WD 1.5TB Black Caviar, 4TB WD Red HD, Thermaltake thoughpower DPS G 1050 wattPSU,Lian-LI PC-011 Dynamic white, Iiyama 27" IPS skærm. Logitech Z213 højtalersæt, Win 10 pro 64 bit.

    Jeg ville genoverveje, om en AMD 8350 cpu virkelig var et godt valg, hvis jeg var dig.


    Prøv at se, hvordan chippen klarer sig i Skyrim jf. dette link:
    http://www.bit-tech.net/hardwa…1/06/amd-fx-8350-review/6


    Og deres konklusion et par sider længere fremme, citat:


    "AMD remains deeply uncompetitive in primarily single threaded applications such as games without offering the significant benefits in multi-threaded applications you’d expect from a chip boasting eight cores. Peak power consumption remains higher than Intel too and it’s these fundamental issues that mean the FX-8350 just isn’t a competitive CPU. Despite the drop in price, there’s almost no reason to opt for the FX-8350 in comparison to the Intel competition; it seems that while AMD’s changed lots of little things about the FX-8350, the end result remains largely the same."


    Læs også hvad de skriver om chippen i deres anmeldelse af den her:
    http://techreport.com/review/2…350-processor-reviewed/14



    Citat:
    "The overall performance scatter offers some good news for AMD fans: the FX-8350 outperforms both the Core i5-3470 and the 3570K in our nicely multithreaded test suite. As a result, the FX-8350 will give you more performance for your dollar than the Core i5-3570K, and it at least rivals our value favorite from Intel, the Core i5-3470.


    Pop over to the gaming scatter, though, and the picture changes dramatically. There, the FX-8350 is the highest-performance AMD desktop processor to date for gaming, finally toppling the venerable Phenom II X4 980. Yet the FX-8350's gaming performance almost exactly matches that of the Core i3-3225, a $134 Ivy Bridge-based processor. Meanwhile, the Core i5-3470 delivers markedly superior gaming performance for less money than the FX-8350. The FX-8350 isn't exactly bad for video games—its performance was generally acceptable in our tests. But it is relatively weak compared to the competition."